You all know my feelings about Susan G. Komen (see my commentary here, here, and here).  And it has always been puzzling to me that a woman whose sister supposedly died of breast cancer that metastasized would establish an organization that hardly mentions it and funds research for it far less than other organizations.

Komen (as an organization) possesses an innate hubris and avarice that allows them to treat those who infringe on their copyright with very heavy hands.  It has over 200 trademarks all of which are watched over and protected by a well paid legal counsel. Komen thinks nothing of strong-arming charities for use of the words “for the cure.”  In 2010, Komen legal counsel, Jonathan Blum said

“It’s never our goal to shut down a nonprofit,” he said, “and we try very hard to be reasonable, but it’s still our obligation to make sure that our trademarks are used appropriately so there’s no confusion in the marketplace over where people’s money is going.” [Huffington Post, 2010]

I would think as legal counsel that it would also be Komen’s obligation to ensure that they do not infringe on the intellectual property of other organizations.  But apparently this is not the case.  For as we see with the Elephant in the (Pink) Room campaign put forth by Kohls and Susan G. Komen, they took possession of the intellectual property of METAvivor without so much as a second thought.

When I saw this campaign for the first time I was not told that it infringed upon METAvivor’s copyright, but as soon as I saw it I knew it was so.  In fact, it was blatantly obvious.   When they were called out on it, Kohl’s Senior Vice President of Marketing called METAvivor President Kelly Lange and was apparently willing to do exactly what Komen has done for the past thirty-two years: throw up a few sentences about metastatic breast cancer and call it a day.  Enough is enough.

METAvivor needs your help.  The women and men with metastatic breast cancer that have been patronized for over thirty years need your help.  Please continue to use social media to support METAvivor in this cause.

  • OCCUPY #talkpink with messages calling for Kohls and Komen to do the right thing.
  • BOYCOTT Kohls.  Ask your friends to do the same.
  • Please devote space on your blogs and Facebook pages to inform your readers of Kohls’ and Komen’s callous disregard for METAvivor’s intellectual property.
  • Please urge your readers to BOYCOTT Kohls.  

This is no joke, folks.  We need to pull out all the stops and do everything we can to support METAvivor while they work with their legal team.  Hopefully they will be able to take steps to make Kohls and Komen cease and desist.

These organizations have a dimension of greed that is incomprehensible to me as an individual, and it is to that greed we must address our grievance.


This entry was posted in Advocacy, Breast Cancer PSAs, Breastploitation, Social Commentary, Stage IV Musings and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Facepalm

  1. Reblogged this on Health Communications and Health Advocacy and commented:
    Please look at the list of to-do’s in this blog post!

  2. Susan says:

    I am so angry. Komen and Kohls have a lot of nerve. We have to keep up the pressure. Why don’t they listen? I am boiling mad. I want them accountable for their despicable actions.

    • Scorchy says:

      Oh, I know, Susan. This is, for me at least, a lesson about what real greed looks like. Avarice. How anyone could stand behind that. But no one cares, they’re all so far removed from these decisions that it’s easy to pass the buck and claim ignorance. But it’s anything but that.

  3. Elizabeth J. says:

    We have to deal with Pinktober, then pancreatic cancer wants to trade (not with me or you they don’t), and the Koman and Kohls decide to steal the elephant. (Hey, out here in the West they used to hang people for horse stealing….) What is going on?

  4. Sandra H, Pinyard says:

    I am a 2X survivor, but I have refused to support Kohmen since their former executive stopped supporting Planned Parenthood. They jumped all over the people who need help the most, those who need mammos and family planning help and have little funding.
    I have never heard of anyone who has received any real financial help from this organization,
    And it disgusts me that Kohmen demands entrance money from people who volunteer to run to raise money. They send me mail nearly every week on nicely printed expensive glossy paper, tellling me how much I should contribute.
    Additionally, unlike other breast cancer organizations, I have NEVER seen anything from Koman publicly chastising companies that ask people to purchase food which “funds breast cancer research” but which contains ingredients that are known to cause cancer. This is downright nasty and appalling.
    Komen pays for little research in proportion to the money they collect. Don’t believe me? Write them and ask what the ratio of cash to expenditures is.

    • Scorchy says:

      You are absolutely right. Last year when Nancy got her 64% pay raise, I learned that they don’t even turn than kind of money into research. They really are an organization that did do good with awareness when they began–I won’t take that away from them. But then they just got greedy and the rest–as they say–is history.

      Thank you so much for stopping by and taking the time to comment. xoxo

  5. nancyspoint says:

    This whole deal has been really something hasn’t it? I’m glad to say I’ve never really shopped at Kohl’s. Guess this won’t be changing any time soon. Thanks for your advocacy regarding this mess. I’ll keep doing what I can…

Enter the Fray

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s